About
We would rather be checkable than impressive.
XR Vision Labs is an engineering company. We build digital evidence systems, provenance-bound digital twins, and telecom access silicon — three things that look unrelated until you notice they fail in the same way. Each of them, done badly, produces something that looks authoritative and cannot be questioned. We are trying to build the version that can be.
What we are
An engineering company with an unusually specific obsession.
Almost every system that produces authoritative output — a digital forensics report, a reconstruction, a network status, a device attestation — asks its reader to accept a conclusion without the means to test it. Usually that is fine. Occasionally it is catastrophic, and the occasions tend to be exactly the ones that end up in front of a court, a regulator, or a board.
So we build for the adversarial case. Not because we expect to be doubted, but because a system that holds up under doubt is a strictly better system than one that only holds up under agreement. Concretely, that means: publish the primitives, canonicalise deterministically, keep the verification path independent of us, and mark inference as inference.
The four product lines are the same principle applied at four altitudes — from the courtroom exhibit down to the boot chain of the device that carried the packet.
Anyone can assert integrity. The engineering is in making the assertion falsifiable.
Disciplines
What sits under the four product lines.
Applied cryptography
Hash chains, Merkle structures, authenticated encryption, key management, detached signing, and the post-quantum schemes now standardised — used conservatively and named explicitly rather than described as “military-grade”.
Digital forensics engineering
Acquisition and analysis across disk, memory, mobile, mail, media and network, plus the unglamorous half — case management, review workflow, reporting, and the legal artefacts that make findings usable.
Distributed systems
Permissioned ledgers, multi-organisation channels, offline-tolerant chaining, dual-backend storage and the reconciliation logic that makes an air-gapped deployment behave predictably when it reconnects.
Real-time 3D and reality capture
Registration and alignment of scan, photogrammetric and survey data; mesh reconstruction; scene-graph interchange; browser and headset delivery; and the provenance tagging that keeps a model accountable to its sources.
Digital design and verification
Networking RTL, protocol datapath design, constrained-random and formal verification, FPGA prototyping, synthesis, and the physical-design and test flows that take a design to a clean tape-out.
Mixed-signal and high-speed
SerDes integration, burst-mode receiver control, clocking, on-chip regulation and thermal behaviour — the analog reality that determines whether a digital design actually works in the field.
Practice
How we work.
These are commitments rather than aspirations — each one is something you can hold us to during an engagement, and several of them cost us sales.
We name the primitive
Every cryptographic claim on this site names the actual algorithm and parameter set. If a page ever says “advanced encryption” without saying which, treat that as a defect and tell us.
We distinguish implemented from aligned
Where something is built against a standard, we say implemented. Where it is designed to meet a requirement that has not yet been independently assessed, we say aligned and assessment pending. We do not blur the two.
We tell you what we cannot do
Early in a conversation, not after a contract. If a requirement is outside what we have built or can credibly build on the schedule offered, saying so is cheaper for everyone than discovering it at acceptance testing.
We do not claim what we have not earned
No certification is listed until it is held. No deployment is described as a reference until the customer has agreed to be one. An empty section on this site is an accurate section.
We design for substitution
Integration points are kept open and formats standard, so a buyer can replace a component of ours — or replace us — without rebuilding everything around it. Lock-in is a business model, not an engineering outcome.
We build for the sovereign case first
On-premises, air-gapped and multi-organisation deployment are the primary design targets rather than enterprise variants added later. Work that involves evidence usually cannot leave the building.
Where we sit
Indigenous by requirement, not by slogan.
Most of what we build is subject to Indian regulatory frameworks that were written on the assumption that a domestic option exists. In several of these categories it does not — which is the gap we are working in.
That is a specific claim rather than a patriotic one. It means the evidence platform is built against the electronic-record rules actually applied in Indian courts; it means the access silicon is specified against the security assurance requirements Indian manufacturers are already bound by; and it means deployment assumes data stays where the law says it stays.
Working with us
We take on platform deployments, evidence-architecture consulting, twin reconstruction engagements, and silicon IP licensing and design-in support. We are also interested in interoperability testing and field trial partnerships for the access silicon programme.
Ask us something specific.
General enquiries are welcome, but the conversations that go somewhere usually start with a hard requirement and a real deadline.